- Details
-
Written by James Zogby interviews Hanan Ashrawi James Zogby interviews Hanan Ashrawi
-
Category: News News
-
Published: 09 July 2010 09 July 2010
-
Last Updated: 09 July 2010 09 July 2010
-
Created: 09 July 2010 09 July 2010
-
Hits: 3480 3480
Ashrawi: Pressure without Progress Could Lead to the "Political Suicide" of the Palestinian National Leadership
See her interview at:
http://www.aaiusa.org/issues/4688/ashrawi-pressure-without-progress-could-lead-to-the-political-suicide-of-the-palestinian-national-leadership
AAI
Posted on Friday July 9, 2010
Ashrawi: Pressure without Progress Could Lead to the "Political Suicide" of the Palestinian National Leadership
On his weekly Television show Viewpoint with James Zogby, Dr. Zogby
hosted PLO Executive Committee member Dr. Hanan Ashrawi to critique the
July 6th White House meeting between President Obama and Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Dr. Ashrawi’s observations are important
and I wanted to share them.
In discussing Israeli-Palestinian proximity talks, Ashrawi warned that
moving to direct talks when no progress has been made will lead to the
Palestinian national leadership’s loss of credibility with its own
constituents. Responding to the question of whether President Abbas
would ultimately be willing to engage in direct talks under present
conditions if pressed by President Obama, Ashrawi noted:
“President Obama has to understand you can push too far. You can really
push people over the edge. They pay attention to Israeli democracy and
public opinion and coalition requirements but they do not pay attention
to the fact that the Palestinians have a very vibrant and active
democracy and very active and outspoken public opinion, and they have
to understand president Abbas does not have a free hand to just make
unilateral single decisions like that in a vacuum…you keep pushing one
person – and I say, don’t make the P.L.O. and national leadership
commit political suicide. You cannot push them beyond their abilities
and to lose their credibility with their own constituency. So if you
need a leadership with credibility, with the ability to deliver, you
cannot undermine them.”
Ashrawi noted that there was a disconnect between public discourse on
the talks where progress is often reported, and the reality of the
talks where she said there was no progress whatsoever. “Perceptions
have become much more important than substance,” said Ashrawi,
attributing the discord between the rhetoric and reality of the
proximity talks to domestic considerations in the US and Israel, which
coincided in favor of presenting an image of reconciliation and
progress when none really existed.
“Netanyahu wants to present his public, his coalition, with the fact
that he has mended fences, that he can speak to Americans, and that
he’s not a liability because people saw him as a liability when it came
to American/Israeli relations. Obama needs to show that he has mended
fences also because of the upcoming elections…and because he’s under a
lot of pressure to show that he’s quite willing to restore Israel to
its special status position with the U.S.”
Left out of this equation are the Palestinians, whose interests lie in
actual progress on the ground and not the mere public image of
progress. Palestinian reluctance to engage in direct talks under
current conditions stems from their experience with the failed peace
process of the 1990s, where the negotiations were a mere symbolic
exercise which Israel used to buy time while it expanded settlements
and unilaterally reshaped the facts on the ground. According to Ashrawi:
“[The Palestinian] position is not just an emotional reaction, it’s a
well thought out position saying we’ve talked forever and they’ve built
settlements forever. We negotiated in good faith and what they did was
negate negotiations and destroy the two-state solution on the ground.
So the question is one of urgency, and one of intervention to curb
Israeli behavior. It’s not a question of just talks.”
Today, the Palestinians find themselves in a similar position, under
pressure to negotiate while Israel continues imposing its facts on the
ground with no regard for the substance of the negotiations. “The
situation is extremely critical,” said Ashrawi, “Palestinian public
opinion is highly inflamed, and it’s very intelligent, very well
informed, and very critical… Palestinians judge things by what happens
on the ground and they see no progress whatsoever.”
Ashrawi explained that the talks are not an end in and of themselves,
but are means to a just and lasting solution; and unless the Obama
administration demonstrates the political will to curb Israeli
policies, the talks will likely face the same failure of previous talks
and for the same reason.