Israel approves 50 settler homes

Israel approves 50 settler homes

Israel has approved the construction of 50 new housing units in a Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank.

Officials said the homes would house settlers being moved from a nearby unauthorised outpost and were only the first part of an expansion plan.

The move runs counter to a demand by Israel's major ally and backer, the US, that it stop all settlement activity on occupied Palestinian land.

It came hours before Defence Minister Ehud Barak was due to fly to the US.

Correspondents say Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's reluctance to comply with a freeze on building in settlements puts him on a collision course with the US.

Israel argues that settlements must be allowed "natural growth", although recent official statistics showed many new homes are purchased by newcomers from Israel or abroad.

The Palestinian Authority says settlements - which are illegal under international law - are one of the biggest barriers to peace, and has vowed to stay away from negotiations until building work is frozen.

Mr Barak will hold talks in the US with President Barack Obama's Middle East envoy, George Mitchell. Mr Netanyahu and Mr Mitchell were due to meet in Paris last Thursday, but their talks were cancelled.

Unauthorised

Israel intends to remove about 200 people from the Migron outpost - deemed illegal by Israel as it is built on private Palestinian land - and re-house them in Adam settlement, north of Jerusalem.

 

The disclosure comes in an affidavit from the Defence Ministry to the Israeli Supreme Court in response to a court case brought by the Israeli anti-settlement group Peace Now.

The document speaks of a master plan to build 1,450 more residential units at Adam, but only 50 of these have been given the go-ahead.

Any additional units would require separate approval from the Defence Ministry, the document said.

A Peace Now spokesman said moving settlers from the small unauthorised camp on a hilltop to a 3,500-strong settlement established by the government sent the wrong message.

"(Settlers) who set up illegal outposts and threatened to use violence if evicted have benefited because the outcome will be that their original settlement will have grown 30-fold," said Yariv Oppenheimer.

Lawyer Michael Sfard, who acts for the Palestinian landowners, told the BBC: "It is outrageous that this is how the government deals with outposts: providing outlaws with a new house."

He also described the government's announcement as an "act of panic", before the final hearing on the fate of Migron is due to be held next Monday.

The Israeli authorities have repeatedly removed structures from the Migron site, but settlers have always returned to rebuild them.

Some 500,000 Israelis live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, occupied by Israel in the 1967 war.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/8124148.stm

Published: 2009/06/29 11:37:57 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Woe to them who heap up what is not their own…

Woe to them who heap up what is not their own…

Woe to them who get evil gain for their house…

For the stone cries out from the wall,

And the beam from the woodwork responds.

Woe to them who build a town with blood,

And found a city on iniquity!

Netanyahu Believes Obama Has Already Backed Down On Settlements


Netanyahu Believes Obama Has Already Backed Down On Settlements
M.J. Rosenberg
Talking Points Memo (Opinion)
June 23, 2009 - 12:00am

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu believes that President Obama has already blinked. The way he sees it, Obama made his demand to stop settlements in Cairo. He, Netanyahu, responded with a firm "no" -- but by uttering the phrase "two states" changed the subject suficiently to get Obama off his back. He also thinks the Iran crisis has diverted Obama's focus away from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and saved him from further pressure.

There is no other way to interpret Netanyahu's dismissal of the settlement issue in his interview with RAI TV in Italy. Settlements? "I think that the more we spend time arguing about this, the more we waste time instead of moving towards peace," he said.

He added that his conditional endorsement of a Palestinian state is all that matters. "A demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes the Jewish State of Israel I think is the winning formula of peace," he said. "I can not understand why anybody who wants peace should reject it."

And, of course, no one does reject it, certainly not the Palestinians who accepted the two-state formula fifteen years ago and remain committed to it. It is just that unless Israel stops settlements, there will be no place for that state to go. And just yesterday the Israeli government authorized another 500 housing units in Har Homa, a West Bank settlement -- a gigantic slap in Obama's face. The US response: silence.

Former Israeli Defense Minister, Moshe Arens, from Netanyahu's Likud party told us exactly what the government is thinking in a wonderfully frank Ha'aretz column on Tuesday. "There was a time before the State of Israel was established when the Jewish people had no choice but to take orders from others...We will gladly accept advice, but not orders."

Netanyahu believes that President Obama has gone as far as he intends to go and that he need only dig in to win. Is he right? The longer we have to wait for an answer, the more likely that he is.

Israel-Palestine is the test. It is the one issue all Arabs and Muslims (and most of the world) is in substantial agreement i.e., that the occupation must end and the two state solution must be implemented.

As Obama said about Iran, the whole world is watching. If the administration flinches, it will be noticed. And our credibility in the Middle East will go back to where it was before Jan. 20. That will be despite all the progress this President has already made in repairing our tattered reputation.

President Obama cannot allow that to happen.

Israel defies US with plan for 240 new homes on Palestinian land


• Ehud Barak approved construction in West Bank
• Scheme cuts farmers' access to land, say critics

Israel's defence ministry has proposed legalising 60 existing homes at a Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank, and building another 240 homes at the site, despite US calls for a halt to settlement growth.

Construction at the outpost, known as Water Reservoir Hill, near the Talmon settlement, north of Ramallah, would "greatly damage" the freedom of movement of Palestinian farmers in the area, according to Bimkom, an Israeli planning rights group.

It said the construction plan was put forward for public inspection shortly after the Israeli government was formed this spring and was first approved by Ehud Barak, the defence minister. It was now awaiting final approval.

But Bimkom added: "In virtually all cases, plans deposited for Israeli settlements were subsequently approved."

The Israeli government insisted the homes were part of old proposals. "These houses have been completed, and there has been no approval given for new houses," one official said.

The plan, which follows a pattern over many years of settlement growth, appears to challenge directly Barack Obama's administration, which has issued several clear calls for an end to the practice.


Read more: Israel defies US with plan for 240 new homes on Palestinian land

Israeli Academic Rachel Giora writes in support of a boycott of Israel

    From:     This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: Suggested entry: Rachel Giora calls for boycott
Date: June 20, 2009 9:58:12 AM MST
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Cc: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Rachel Giora, a prominent Israeli feminist and a Professor of Linguistics at
Tel Aviv University, calls for boycott against Israel
Her message includes recounting of some of the successes of the boycott
movement to date, after which she proceeds to explain why an academic
boycott is justified.

Racheli Gai.



http://www.bricup.org.uk/documents/israel_unis/Giora.pdf
A message to BRICUP’s pre UCU Congress 2009 meeting from Rachel Giora,
Professor of Linguistics at Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv
20.5.2009

Dear Colleagues,
I am writing to express my support of your actions toward helping the boycott
movement become engulfing and effective. By responding to the Palestinian call
to boycott Israel, you emerged as the pioneers of the boycott movement against
Israel and I hope you will be able to witness its impact on redressing injustices
and on changing the face of the world.

Thanks to you, the boycott movement against Israel is now gaining force.
Examples abound: Dock workers in South Africa refused to offload a ship
carrying Israeli goods; Western Australian members of the Maritime Union of
Australia have also called for a boycott of all Israeli vessels and all vessels
bearing goods arriving from or going to Israel ; a Turkish company refused to do
business with Israelis “with blood on their hands”; young individuals in France
cleared Israeli goods off a store’s shelve. The boycott movement is indeed biting.
Israeli goods are losing foreign markets: 21% of Israeli exporters report that
they are facing problems in selling Israeli goods because of an anti-Israel
boycott, mainly from the UK and Scandinavian countries.

That business is not as usual as can be gleaned from the EU decision to
freeze a planned upgrade of ties with Israel in order to pressure its government
to abide by the international commitments made towards the welfare of the
Palestinian people. “We expect a stop of all activities undermining our objective
of a two-state solution… citing the expansion of Israeli settlements in the
Palestinian territories … which is continuing on a daily basis.".

Israel is also facing cultural isolation: Israel’s sports teams have met with
hostile protests in Sweden, Spain and Turkey. Israeli money donated to help
fund the 2009 film festival in Edinburgh International Film Festival (EIFF) was
returned to the Israeli Embassy.

The Academic boycott started in Britain by you and people like you is
perhaps the most solid form of cultural boycott to-date, resonating in universities
and academic institutions all over the world: Cardiff University divested from
Israel; CUPE-Ontario's University Workers Coordinating Committee (OUWCC)
encouraged members “to hold public forums to discuss an academic boycott of
Israeli academic institutions”; Quebec College Federation joined the BDS
campaign; Australian scholars called for a boycott of Israeli academic and
cultural institutions; US academics agitated for academic boycott of Israel..

But shouldn’t Israeli academic institutions be exempted, some wonder?
After all such institutions focus on academic research with no recourse to the
military or state politics. But in fact Israeli academia is no different from any
other Israeli institution, and in many cases it plays an active if not a vital role in
supporting Israeli apartheid practices against the Palestinians. For example, “the
R&D [Research & Development] Directorate of the Israel Ministry of Defense is
currently funding 55 projects at TAU [Tel Aviv University]”; “Military R&D in
Israel would not exist without the universities. They carry out all the basic
scientific investigation, which is then developed either by defense industries or
the army”; “People are just not aware of how important university research is in
general and how much TAU contributes to Israel’s security in particular”; “In the
rough and tumble reality of the Middle East, Tel Aviv University is at the front
line of the critical work to maintain Israel’s military and technological edge.”
Israeli universities run special programs for the military. Just recently, the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem won the Defense Ministry Bidding to establish
the Military Medical Program. Tel Aviv University runs an Executive Master's
Program in Diplomacy and Security at the social sciences faculty, to cite just a
few examples.

And in spite of the growing plight of their Palestinians colleagues,
universities’ senates and heads have never spoken up against the Israeli
occupation of the Palestinian territory or against the oppression of the
Palestinians; nor have they protested the destructive damage inflicted on
Palestinian academic institutions by the Israeli military; nor have they shown any
concern for or solidarity with their Palestinian colleagues. And when given the
chance to protest “the policy of the Israeli government which is causing
restrictions of freedom of movement, study and instruction, and […] call upon
the government to allow students and lecturers free access to all the campuses
in the Territories, and to allow lecturers and students who hold foreign passports
to teach and study without being threatened with withdrawal of residence visas”,
only very few (407 out of over 5000) faculty have chosen to sign this petition. Is
“academic freedom” only the prerogative of the powerful?

These are only shreds of evidence testifying to the complicity of Israeli
academic institutions in the state's apartheid policies against the Palestinians.
In light of Israel’s widely documented disregard for international laws
exercised in our area for so many years, culminating in two recent wars against
civilians in Lebanon and Gaza, it is left for us citizens of the world to attempt to
hold up a mirror to Israel’s real face in the hope that it will give it a chance to
choose justice and peace over occupation.

The growing numbers of Israelis who are now supporting cultural and
academic boycotts will rejoice in your achievements.

I wish you luck with your conference and actions.
In solidarity,
Rachel Giora

................................................................
--------
Jewish Peace News editors:
Joel Beinin
Racheli Gai
Rela Mazali
Sarah Anne Minkin
Judith Norman
Lincoln Shlensky
Rebecca Vilkomerson
Alistair Welchman
------------
Jewish Peace News archive and blog: http://jewishpeacenews.blogspot.com
------------
Jewish Peace News sends its news clippings only to subscribers. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or manage your subscription, go to http://www.jewishpeacenews.net
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.